United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration FHWA HomeFeedback
Planning

Case Study:

Albany, New York

Methodology

Procedure

The specific steps in the modeling procedure are as follows:

  1. For each traffic analysis zone, compute the residential development strength (RDS) as shown in Equation 1, based on:
  • Potential number of new households that could be built in the zone, given developable land remaining and expected dwelling unit density;
  • Median price of owner-occupied housing units in the zone, divided by the median price of all owner-occupied housing units;
  • Ratio of total property tax rate per $1,000 full value in the zone to the mean property tax rate per $1,000 for all zones; and
  • Number of households in the zone at the beginning of each increment.

Equation 1

Equation

Where:

HHPOTj = Potential number of new households that could be built in zone j.
PRICERATIOj = Ratio of median price of owner-occupied housing units in zone j, to the median price of all owner-occupied housing units.
TAXRATIOj = Ratio of total property tax rate per $1,000 full value in zone j to the mean property tax rate per $1,000 for all zones.
HHBEGINj = Number of households in zone j at the beginning of each increment.
a, b, c, d, and k = Coefficients developed from regression analysis of historical residential growth in the region.
  1. Select an increment of total future household growth to allocate.
  2. Allocate this growth to each zone j based on the following factors (see Equation 2):
  • Residential development strength of zone j;
  • Employment accessibility of zone j (a function of total employment in each zone i and travel time between zones i and j); and
  • A zone-specific residential calibration factor.

Equation 2

Equation

Where:

dHHij,n  = Number of households allocated to zone j for workers employed in zone i for increment n.
dHHtot,n  = Number of households available for allocation in increment n.
EMPi  = Fixed employment in zone i.
dEMPi,1…n-1  = Employment added to zone i in previous increments.
RDSj  = Residential Development Strength of zone j.
tij  = Peak hour travel time by primary mode between zone i and j.
b = Gravity model exponent for work-to-home and home-to-work trips.
HHCFi  = Calibration factor derived from the ratio of CDRPC forecast household growth for the zone to the modeled household growth for the zone.
  1. Select an increment of total future employment growth to allocate.
  2. (Equation 3) Allocate this employment growth to each zone j, based on:
  • Employment accessibility of zone j (a function of total employment in each zone i and travel time between zones i and j);
  • Residential accessibility of zone j (a function of total employment in each zone i and travel time between zones i and j); and
  • A zone-specific employment calibration factor.

Equation 3

Equation

Where:

dEMPij,n  = Employment allocated to zone j based on households in zone i and other employment in zone i, for increment n.
HHi  = Fixed households in zone i.
a = Gravity model exponent for home-to-other and other-to-home trips as calibrated in CDTC’s travel model.
s = Gravity model exponent for other-to-other trips.
EMPCFi  = Calibration factor derived from the ratio of CDRPC forecast employment growth for the zone to the modeled employment growth for the zone.
Other variables are as defined in Equation 2.
  1. Repeat the process from step 1 until all future household and employment growth has been allocated.

[TOP]

Toolbox Home | Planning Home


FHWA Home | Feedback
FHWA